// October 18th, 2006 // No Comments » // Blog
I asked Nayland Blake to ask some general questions (some time ago) that I could use on my art blog but (I previously thought) these too personal. I’m probably wrong. Forgive me if these have appeared before. So, here goes:
Q: Which family member was most important for your practice as an artist, either by example or by direction?
A: I was more interested in music and writing than visual art until meeting my high school friend, Ray Bravo. I don’t know that I think of him as inspiration for that change of direction in my thinking because he’s a painter and I was more interested in photography. However, back to writing, my mother and grandmother used to read great poetry to us kids, Langston Hughes, Paul Lawrence Dunbar, and I was impressed that Arna Bontemps’ (another writer) daughter was a friend of my mother. So, nobody really directed me towards the arts, especially my parents. My father actually offered to pay for my entire college education if I chose a business major. I think that was really stupid (on his part) when I had shown no interest in it and he certainly didn’t talk to me about it with any enthusiasm I recognized. My mother was obviously thrilled about creativity and wanted me to give her some of my photographs but, never showed interest in my poetry (being too cryptic and revealing only a few glimpses of what I really wanted to say).
Q: What is the one work related thing (piece of equipment cup of coffee, etc.) you can’t do without and why?
A: If by work related, you mean teaching, I don’t have anything I have to have because I’ve had very little during this career. I’ve had a real office since 2002, I have access to a digital camera and, that will be difficult to give up but, if I have to, I’ll continue to live. I also have a laptop to use. I also have a darkroom to use. I would hate to give it all up but, since I’m an adjunct, I have nothing really except my own person files and books to keep if I move to another job.
Q: Describe a milestone in your romantic life.
A: Well, I guess I’d have to say realizing that I could actually love a man, a specific man. There were a few men that I liked a lot but the one man that made me realize it, unfortunately, has since died. I’ve mostly felt inadequate romantically because almost all of the men I wanted to develop a romantic relationship with were not interested in doing the same thing. I guess my choices have been wrong rather than being a matter of inadequacy then.
Q: What do you find most irritating about the art of our day and what would you do to correct it?
A: That is actually a very tough question. Everything it seems is part of the capitalist machine and to change that would seem to inevitably require a change in the nature of the human species because, greed and corruption will never go away. It’s a very big part of capitalism. So, if anything irritates me it’s that art is so tied to its financial value rather than to its social value. And, if social value of specific artworks can be raised it almost has to be using the current economic model by raising the economic first then, the social. But, some would say the economic value is its social value. Like all things contemporary, we are too close to our own time and place to be able to assess it with any real authority.
Q: You have written about the orishas – is your engagement with them part of a larger spiritual practice, if not, how does your artmaking reflect your spiritual beliefs?
A: Orisha worship is part of a larger spiritual practice for me although, its intensity has diminished over the years. By that, I mean I don’t attend a temple like I did many years ago. Some things happened including, deaths of priests/ priestesses, that have kept me a bit isolated, by choice. I do have several orishas here (“warriors”) and, therefore, do participate in regular worship. I have learned something about Yoruba language, herbalism, various traditions (Cuban, Haitian, Brazilian, Nigerian, Dahomeian, etc.), how to worship on my own because I was living in a rural area for a good number of years away from any other worshippers.
As far as it dovetailing with my art practice, it does inform some of the philosophical underpinnings but, not heavily weighted on the visual side as one might think. I mean I don’t make the majority of my art that would be identified as related to orisha. Much of it cannot be restricted aesthetically to African Atlantic culture even if that is my origination point. But, things such as color choices are reflected as a choice related to orisha worship: red, white, black, yellow (naturally produced colors like red dust from a particular African tree which is not really red but reddish brown, white kaolin from a river, black charcoal, yellow from another plant which is more like a darker mixture of mustard seed yellow). The use of negative images to reflect the spiritual world that would mirror this one, for instance.
My high school friend I mentioned in the first answer, has also produced art over the years that is closely related to mine, visually, because of his interest in the spiritual. He’s Chicano with childhood background loosely in Catholicism. My childhood was also Christian. Part of my reason for moving to Florida was to become more acquainted with the Africanness of my family. It has been a very enlightening journey although, the search brought me much more than knowledge about my family.
